Stenlow Gazette
London, 2026 — Editorial Standards

How We Work

Stenlow Gazette operates under a defined set of editorial principles. The following document describes how articles are conceived, recorded, reviewed, and published. It is updated when practice changes.

01 Field Record 02 Source Check 03 Editorial Review 04 Publication 05 Corrections
Open notebook with handwritten research notes on a wooden desk beside a cup of tea, natural window light, editorial workspace
Editorial workspace — Stenlow Gazette, Clerkenwell
01 — Principles

Editorial principles

Stenlow Gazette operates under the following editorial principles: articles are reviewed by at least one second editor before publication, sources are cited where appropriate, corrections are noted publicly, and writers disclose any commercial relationships that could influence their selection of subject matter.

Articles published on Stenlow Gazette are editorial in nature and reflect the writers' observations on everyday nutrition practices and weight awareness. The content is not intended as professional advice, nor as guidance for the engagement with any specific condition. Readers with specific concerns about their daily routines are encouraged to speak with a qualified wellness professional.

Stenlow Gazette is an independent editorial publication focused on everyday nutrition practices and weight awareness. The publication is not affiliated with any commercial, governmental, or institutional body.

02 — Process

The publication process

01
Field record

Every article begins as a personal record kept over a defined period — typically four weeks or more. The record documents eating occasions, movement patterns, or food preparation practices as they actually occur. No narrative is imposed on the record while it is being kept. The writer is a recorder, not an analyst, during this phase. Record formats include written notebooks, spreadsheet entries, and annotated receipts.

02
Pattern review and source check

Once the record is complete, the writer reviews it for patterns — consistencies, variations, and anomalies. Each observation identified in the pattern review is checked against the available nutritional literature. Where peer-reviewed research supports or contradicts the observation, it is noted. Where no such source exists, the observation is flagged as a personal field note. The distinction between the two is preserved in the final text.

03
Editorial review

Content published by Stenlow Gazette is selected based on published nutritional research and reviewed for editorial accuracy by a second editor before publication. The review covers factual accuracy of cited sources, consistency of claims with the underlying record, and adherence to the journal's editorial principles. The reviewing editor may request revisions or decline publication. The final decision rests with the founding editor.

04
Publication

Published articles carry the author's name, publication date, and reading-time estimate. Inline citations use standard attribution — author, publication, year — where sources are referenced. Observations without a peer-reviewed source are identified as such in the text. No article is published under a pseudonym or without a named author. Commercial interests relevant to the subject matter are disclosed in the author biography accompanying the article.

05
Corrections policy

Errors in published articles are corrected promptly on notification. Corrections are appended to the original article text with a dated correction notice — not removed, not silently edited. The correction notice identifies what was changed and why. Readers wishing to notify the journal of a potential error should write to [email protected] with the article URL and the specific passage in question.

03 — Sources

Source standards

Accepted sources
  • Peer-reviewed journals in nutritional science
  • Published dietary research from recognised independent institutions
  • Government dietary guidelines (UK NHS, SACN)
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
  • Named personal field records (attributed to the author)
Not accepted as citation
  • Commercial product literature or brand-sponsored research
  • Influencer or social-media accounts
  • Undated or unsourced web articles
  • Anecdotal third-party reports without attribution
  • Single-study claims without broader context

Where a claim relies on a single study, the article will note the limitation of the evidence. Where the nutritional literature is contested — as it often is — the article will represent the range of positions rather than selecting the most convenient one for the narrative. The journal's obligation is to the accuracy of what is known, not to the elegance of a particular argument.

04 — Accuracy

Accuracy and scope

What the journal is

Stenlow Gazette is a documentary nutrition journal. Its scope is the observation of eating patterns, seasonal produce, movement habits, and the everyday relationship between food choices and weight awareness. Its register is journalistic and factual, not prescriptive or promotional.

What the journal is not

The journal does not evaluate specific weight-management programmes, endorse products, or offer individualised dietary guidance. It does not publish reviews of supplements, assessments of structured programmes, or any content that functions as a personal dietary directive to the reader.

Limitations of field-note evidence

Personal field records are observational, not experimental. They document what happened, not why it happened or what would happen under different conditions. The journal regards field-note evidence accordingly: as useful context for exploring a subject, not as proof of a causal relationship.

Wellness professional consultation

We recommend speaking with a qualified wellness or nutrition professional before introducing any new habit or routine to your daily life, particularly if you have specific dietary requirements.

05 — FAQ

Common questions